Comments on: Visible Sounds: What You Can’t See Won’t Hurt You? http://thinkdemux.com/2010/01/26/visible-sounds-what-you-cant-see-wont-hurt-you/ Wed, 07 Mar 2012 21:40:42 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: guy bingley http://thinkdemux.com/2010/01/26/visible-sounds-what-you-cant-see-wont-hurt-you/#comment-1836 Wed, 27 Jan 2010 10:03:12 +0000 http://thinkdemux.com/?p=2355#comment-1836 Haha! Yes, ‘loud adverts’ have got a lot of coverage. ‘Loud idents/ titles’ too – which I guess are adverts for a TV show within the TV show.

That makes me feel more confident that ad peeps will take to showing sound, seeing as they can’t just crank it up anymore. (At least, not without informed complaint.)

]]> By: tommydigital http://thinkdemux.com/2010/01/26/visible-sounds-what-you-cant-see-wont-hurt-you/#comment-1835 Wed, 27 Jan 2010 08:21:29 +0000 http://thinkdemux.com/?p=2355#comment-1835 Interesting that advertisers were way ahead of the game on this, and have been using it for years to make people pay more attention during commercial breaks. The spokesman for ITV in this article has a different way of explaining what you’ve been talking about, though. He says that the adverts aren’t louder, they just ‘sound louder’… http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/7388473.stm

]]>